🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.